On 2015-10-21 12:02, Raimon Esteve wrote: > 2015-10-21 9:25 GMT+02:00 Raimon Esteve <[email protected]>: > > 2015-10-20 21:53 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>: > >> On 2015-10-20 21:17, Jordi Esteve wrote: > >>> El 20/10/15 a les 19:24, Cédric Krier ha escrit: > >>> >On 2015-10-20 19:07, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > >>> >>2015-10-20 18:38 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>: > >>> >>>Hi, > >>> >>> > >>> >>>I was discussing about issue5016 [1] which is indeed a continuation of > >>> >>>issue4410 [2] and I came with the idea that we should remove the > >>> >>>invoice/credit_note type on the Invoice object. > >>> >>>Such types are really a big constraint that prevent us to generate > >>> >>>mixed > >>> >>>documents (half invoice and half credit note). > > > > About <<la expedición en series específicas de las facturas > > siguientes>> page 23, the "series especificas" talk about > > "unique/different sequences". > > > > I asked account people for legal requiriments in Spain. I'm waiting the > > answer. > > Confirmed. Credit note has different sequence in Spain and Catalonia.
"has" doesn't mean it is a strict requirement. By the way, what is the definition of an Invoice and a Credit Note? If you say they have to have a diffrent sequence, you have a way to say which is one type and which is the other type. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
