On 2017-10-28 06:48, Richard PALO wrote: > Le 28/10/2017 à 01:12, Cédric Krier a écrit : > > On 2017-10-27 22:27, Richard PALO wrote: > >>> So do not fill it. You do not need to have the supplier price, it is > >>> there for information. > >>> > >> > >> ?? I thought that stock receptions used the order prices (not the invoiced > >> price) for stock > >> valuation on the stock move. Has this changed, or do I misunderstand the > >> workflow? > >> That is, it is frequent here to have invoices based upon [one or more] > >> deliveries. > > > > You should know the price of the product when you validated the > > quotation and at worst when you receive the goods so you can update the > > price on the move. > > > > Indeed, that is my point. > > With respect to promotions, sale_promotion is only for sales and not > purchases. > It seems that it should be neutral, but I imagine you suggest in this case > that > a purchase_promotion module be devised....
If you want but I do not think it is a generic feature because as I said most of companies will never encode all the rules of suppliers supposed that they know it. At best they will have a spreadsheet with the price list (and some will be per quantity) which can be uploaded as product supplier price. But the common behaviour is to just adapt the price from the received quotation. This workflow will be improved by the new purchase_request_quotation: https://bugs.tryton.org/issue6175 And even I'm wondering if the unit_price should not be editable on more state than draft and not required before confirmed. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/20171028092730.GC6037%40kei.
