-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 if you choose to download a project that has different rpms for different FC versions, consider building yourself from tar.gz or src.rpm.
If they manage to put so much intelligence in the rpm, that it is "multi distro FC/SuSE/Mandriva" then it might be likely that it will install ok on TSL. I once found a rpm that asked for a fixed version (including two dots! x.y.z) of another library, when building myself it turned out that even x could change without failure of the same programme. out of curiosity I tried to use the binary from the forementioned rpm, and it worked also ok (after cleaning out my own rpm build to make sure). So if a programme knows what he is doing, he can decide to "generalize" the rpm a bit. just my two cents matthias On 18.04.2006, at 19:52, infernus wrote: > I know, originally, TSL was based on Redhat (version 6.x, I > believe). Which distribution does it most closely resemble now? I > am confused as to which RPM to download at sites which list RPMs > for Fedora Core 5 all the way down to Redhat 9 and would like to > know which would be best. Also, I use bastille so I want to know > which version of Redhat is closest so I can apply that > configuration. Thanks. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFERfUUap3aeqXTiGERApHPAKCK6YNkHqxOoEyz6hEkVBewkfXypQCdHBiY ShaJHiKQWu0aAP0T1QI96h0= =Rv4Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
