Denis Solovyov skrev:
>> I know, originally, TSL was based on Redhat (version 6.x, I
>> believe). Which distribution does it most closely resemble now? I
>> am confused as to which RPM to download at sites which list RPMs
>> for Fedora Core 5 all the way down to Redhat 9 and would like to
>> know which would be best. Also, I use bastille so I want to know
>> which version of Redhat is closest so I can apply that
> 
> Why do you want to install with third-party RPMs?
> Why is building from sources not suitable?  It is easy and will
> always be compatible.  For many reasons I compile from sources
> even some software which exists in original RPMs (such as PHP,
> apache, or proftpd), and feel just fine.

Pretty much the same reasons you use original RPMs: maintainability and
efficiency.

* You know what depends on what (less chance of breaking Y when upgrading X)
* You have better control over what is installed (query the RPM database)
* Clean unistall
* Cleaner upgrades
* Uniform interface for installing/removing/upgrading
* The spec-file will contain all your --enables and the likes, no need
to recompile PHP 12 times because you forgot to compile with some
feature, or hours of bughunting only to discover you forgot some
--enable/--disable that changed behaviours (hmm... That almost ended up
as a rant...)
* Builtin changelog ("Ah, I manually built this RPM because the official
one lack feature 'foo'")
* Quick upgrades (often all you need to do is change version number in
spec-file and rebuild. Source is downloaded automagically. Build once,
deploy everywhere.)
* (Go Google for more ;)

I don't have time to do source install, as it requires far more effort
(production boxes involve a lot more than just
wget/tar/configure/make/make install).
But with several administrators and/or limited time to do sysadmin work
there is a lot to gain from using customized RPMs.

There is nothing you can not do with packages that you can do with
source installs, but not the other way around.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
tsl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss

Reply via email to