Christian Haugan Toldnes wrote: > > Try installing Ubuntu Server. You get nothing you don't absolutely > need, just like TSL. Same way with most other distributions today. TSL > identified that as a problem early on, and dealt with it. The others > came around, and since TSL haven't evolved since then, it's not needed. >
Actually, we do have servers running Ubuntu Server 6.xx LT I still prefer TSL, primarely because if it Redhat origin and feel. Thats why Centos4/5 (and paid copies of RHES4/5) comprise most new installs. That being said, we do have customers asking for Ubuntu. > Small distros that takes the technology further is always needed. TSL > haven't been innovative for the last many years. > >> >> Certainly there is a need for a 'TSL' like distro in the linux >> community. > > All major distributions are equal to or better than TSL at everything > TSL tries to be today. > TSL was/is good at being a nice lightweight server distro. There certainly are not a lot of choices there. -bill > > _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
