Hello all ! Also keep in mind that some "old" users of TSP, might find difficult to use new tools like git. On enterprise servers, it's sometimes very painfull to add new tools. So if you find a solution to keep backward compatibility, that could be nice.
Yves 2009/6/3 Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.dewee...@xprog.eu> > Hi, > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 11:35:42AM +0200, Eric Noulard wrote: > > 2009/6/3 Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.dewee...@xprog.eu>: > [...] > > We could but I don't really like the idea of a "master" CVS, > > while most of us will certainly want git or hg or git or hg or ... > > Note that having a "master" git @ Savannah does not exclude the idea > > of having other git synchronized tree elsewhere is order to ensure > > that those servers can sustain the load of our commit rate :-) > > No more seriously having some git/hg tree replica will > > ensure better chance of recovery. > Definitely, the idea of a master CVS comes from the fear of having users > unable to checkout for whatever reason. With CVS sync and still the > main repo and git, we'd get the better of both worlds. I wasn't aware > of savannah having a git-cvsserver, great. > > > > > Concerning Savannah outage I have to temper your words. > [...] > They were indeed a bit harsh :-) > > Regards, > Frederik > > > _______________________________________________ > Tsp-devel mailing list > Tsp-devel@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tsp-devel > -- Nous ne léguons pas la terre à nos enfants, mais nous la leur empruntons. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JvVf1piHXg
_______________________________________________ Tsp-devel mailing list Tsp-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tsp-devel
