-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > On 4 jun 2009, at 17:56, Lloyd Wood wrote: > >> Not sure it's an application issue, as there is work to be done on the >> transports. > > No, the transports are already there, it's adapting HTTP to using them. That sounds right to me. Why wouldn't this be in the HTTP WG? FWIW - the HTTP over SCTP paper has issues, notably the claims about SCTP avoiding TIME-WAIT. If anyone bumps into them or knows where that discussion is happening, it might be useful to point them to the recent thread on that issue on this list. Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkon9JcACgkQE5f5cImnZrtnJACgoUAT14lPTu4KwubfNWunV5AV jWYAn1I9egQqoReyxK45XaGXet/oR7Y6 =SfK2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
