On 4 Jun 2009, at 17:21, Joe Touch wrote:
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 4 jun 2009, at 17:56, Lloyd Wood wrote:
Not sure it's an application issue, as there is work to be done on
the
transports.
No, the transports are already there, it's adapting HTTP to using
them.
That sounds right to me. Why wouldn't this be in the HTTP WG?
If you mean httpbis, its charter has been deliberately very limited to
rule out, well, everything pretty much other than revising rfc2616.
FWIW - the HTTP over SCTP paper has issues, notably the claims about
SCTP avoiding TIME-WAIT. If anyone bumps into them or knows where that
discussion is happening, it might be useful to point them to the
recent
thread on that issue on this list.
You could send the authors mail...
DTN work: http://info.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/saratoga/
<http://info.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><[email protected]>
