Hi, why is ROHC not a solution?
Lars On 2013-11-20, at 6:13, Jose Saldana <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all. > > We have the idea of asking for a BoF in London in March 2014. For this aim, > we should discuss a new version of the charter draft. I send it in the next > e-mail. > > This e-mail summarizes the improvements. I have put different numbers, in > order to discuss them separately in the list. > > 1- In order to be consistent with the drafts, the charter should talk about > "TCM-ingress and egress optimizers" instead of "TCM multiplexers and > demultiplexers". > > 2- A new scenario has been included "a wireless Internet connection shared > by a number of people in a place with low Internet penetration", taking into > account that some people from Africa were interested on TCM for improving > real-time applications in this kind of places. > > 3- Scenario: "a community network, in which a number of people in the same > geographical place share their connections in a cooperative way". It has > some similarities with the previous one. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_network. > > 4- Scenario: "a satellite connection used for providing connectivity in a > non-connected area during a short period of time (e.g. journalists covering > the arrival of a mountain stage of a cycling competition)." > > 5- Scenario: " - an air-to-ground connection providing Internet > connectivity to the passengers of an aircraft, multiplexing a number of > simultaneous VoIP flows. The same can be applied between a cruise ship and a > satellite." http://www.gogoair.com/gogo/cms/work.do > > 6- According to the feedback received in the BoF in Berlin, the references > to TCP have been removed. > > 7- A reference to the potential problem of the MTU and packet loss has been > added in number 8: "The eventual impact of multiplexing on protocol dynamics > (e.g. the lost of a multiplexed packet, MTU-related issues) will also have > to be addressed.." > > > Any other suggestions, according to what we discussed in the BoF? > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/minutes/minutes-87-tcmtf > > > Best regards, > > Jose Saldana >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
