Hi, all,

I've noted this before, but to share with other areas:

Although I'm not averse to middleboxes as optional optimizations, I find
the proposed mechanisms aren't quite optional -- they inject option
information into the SYN data. That information would poison a
connection to a legacy receiver if (more to the point, when) that info
isn't removed by a proxy upstream of the receiver.

TCP must be E2E and fall back to legacy endpoints without a reconnection
attempt, as required by RFC793.

These aren't generic solutions; they're attacks on a TCP connection, IMO.

Joe


On 7/18/2017 3:22 PM, Olivier Bonaventure wrote:
> The working group has discussed this issue several times and today we
> have presented a new design that supports the creation of such
> functions to convert MPTCP connections into TCP connections and vice
> versa. The design was done with MPTCP in mind, but the proposed
> solution could be more generic and applied to other use cases than
> MPTCP. The draft that describes the new design is available via:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bonaventure-mptcp-converters-01.txt
>
>
> Mirja Kuehlewind suggested to send the document on the int-area and
> tsv-area mailing lists to see whether other working groups could be
> interested by this approach. 

Reply via email to