Suggestion:
There where a good amount of raise-of-hands during the meeting of
people who said they would contribute to the effort.
Maybe it would make sense to try to collect the actual names and which
specific type of documents they would want to contribute to and roles
(editor, author, contributor, shepherd, reviewer, implementer).
Maybe opening up a notes.ietf.org with the candidate list of deliverables
and then ask for folks to add themselves to those items with the appropriate
roles.
WHen there is such a list of deliverables and people/roles, then the charter
is merely a reverse engineering of that word into appropriate text.
The other direction, of trying to get to the actual work from just charter text
seems more difficult to me.
Cheers
Toerless
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 09:51:20AM -0700, Martin Duke wrote:
> Hello transport area,
>
> As most of us are now through our holidays, I thought I'd ask again for
> someone to drive the proposed congestion control working group charter to
> consensus:
>
> https://github.com/martinduke/congestion-control-charter
>
> It would be good for this to transition from an AD-driven to a
> community-driven process.
>
> While I said it would be nice if these proponents could continue on as WG
> chairs or document editors, I want to be clear that volunteering to do this
> in no way commits you to either.
>
> Thanks,
> Martin
> Transport AD
--
---
[email protected]
