Execution is tied to linking in order to facilitate TDD, you want the edit-compile-link-test cycle to be as fast as possible with minimal bottlenecks.
On Monday, 26 May 2014 22:43:28 UTC+12, Andrew Wagner wrote: > > I don't follow the question... why is execution tied to linking in your > setup? Also, if each test is a separate executable, it sounds like your > build is already extremely modular... > > If your tests are generating a report file or something, you could add the > running of each test as a rule that depends on the test executable (along > with any other input data). If you are using some magic inside your > application to run tests at dynamic link time, perhaps this would be > cleaner... > > If you are trying to temporarily switch off building and running of the > tests, you can use a configuration variable and ifdefs in your Tupfiles to > add/remove them from your build... > > > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 7:22 AM, thegreendroid <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Will over-specifying all object files as inputs into the link step work? >> >> -- >> -- >> tup-users mailing list >> email: [email protected] <javascript:> >> unsubscribe: [email protected] <javascript:> >> options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "tup-users" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- -- tup-users mailing list email: [email protected] unsubscribe: [email protected] options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tup-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
