On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 23:26:26 +1000, Neil Shepperd wrote:
> They're having the tests run by Tup as part of the build process. It
> makes sense to me, since it means that tests that ran successfully and
> are unaffected by the new modifications won't be re-run (although
> there are downsides to this, such as the loss of that warm fuzzy
> feeling you get from seeing 20 green "test passed" messages!).
It makes sense to *depend* on the link step, but it doesn't make sense
to do:
ln -o exe && ./exe
*as* your link step (which, IIRC, is what was posted before).
> Execution is tied to linking in that tup obviously re-runs the
> executable if it has been modified (ie. re-linked).
--Ben
--
--
tup-users mailing list
email: [email protected]
unsubscribe: [email protected]
options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"tup-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
