> > On Wednesday, June 11, 2014 11:01:02 AM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote: >> >> >> Groups should still be the correct way to handle this. I just pushed a >> simple patch to fix them with the Lua parser - they weren't handled >> correctly in a few cases (notably when using '%f' and the like). Can you >> pull the latest and give it a try in the Lua parser and see if it helps? Eg: >> >> tup.foreach_rule('*.c', 'gcc -c %f -o %o', {'%B.o', '<objs>'}) >> tup.rule('<objs>', 'gcc %<objs> -o %o', 'prog') >> >> Mike, Sorry for taking so long to get back to you. The patch works perfectly, and I have merged by Tup_Lua branch back into my main dev branch.
Rendaw and MIke- Thank you very much, once again, for your assistance with this. I am really pleased that this is now working, and I could not have done this without your help. Thanks and best regards, Shmuel -- -- tup-users mailing list email: [email protected] unsubscribe: [email protected] options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tup-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
