W dniu 2014-07-27 10:10, venkatakrishnarao ks pisze:
As you can see, expanded command doesn't contain the file name. I'm
forced to hardcode the output file name.
or Am I using it incorrectly?
Well, what you're doing here is not a use case for %<group> - these are
meant to be used as an input to command that take MANY sources - like
linking. That's why %B doesn't work with that. To use them for ordering,
you use them as "extra_inputs" in lua (or order-only dependency in
tup-parser). Your example is too simple to show the real problem - if
you'd have multiple generators which would output their files NOT in
their own folder (for example - in the project's root), then this
couldn't be done easily without explicitly naming the input files for
next rules... I tried to experiment with that a bit, but I couldn't make
it work and not I have no more time... I'll try again later - in the
evening.
Another question is - does it make sense to have rules that just compile
unknown number of generated sources... You usually know that you
generate them, so it's possible to just list them...
Maybe it would work if all generators would output to some designated
subfolder (like PATH_ROOT .. "/generated")?
Regards,
FCh
--
--
tup-users mailing list
email: [email protected]
unsubscribe: [email protected]
options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tup-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
