On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Ben Boeckel <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 16:25:26 +0200, Andrew Wagner wrote: > > Do reconsider building in source, though; people still debate about > > it, but many of the old reasons for an out-of-source build are > > obsolete if you're using git/tup. > > Umm, not to my knowledge. In-source builds still force me to one source > checkout per build tree which is not realistic in all cases. For some > projects I work on, I have 4+ build trees at the same time (static, > shared, Fortran support, Python support, build needed for project X, and > more). Like I said, people debate about this :) And of course it depends on your application. In my application many of our targets are generating code snippets, and it is convenient to have them next to the other code they need to interface with when we're debugging them. I do use variants, but they're targeting different machines, so I just build each variant in-source on the machine it is targeting. -- -- tup-users mailing list email: [email protected] unsubscribe: [email protected] options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tup-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
