Just curious, what big project are you maintaining with (CMake?)/ninja?
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Ben Boeckel <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 20:06:41 +0200, Andrew Wagner wrote: > > Like I said, people debate about this :) > > I was more disputing the "git/tup make out-of-source build reasons > obsolete" part since I actually like out-of-source a lot *more* with > git. For example, with SVN, you're basically juggling multiple source > trees with branches *anyways*. I don't know how tup would make them any > less desireable either. > > > And of course it depends on your application. In my application many > > of our targets are generating code snippets, and it is convenient to > > have them next to the other code they need to interface with when > > we're debugging them. > > Hmm. I've had no issues with debugging sources that live in the build > tree (i.e., the paths from the debuginfo work just fine in the > debugger; both in VS and gdb). (FWIW, I think there are ~3000 code-gen > related targets for each language binding enabled in the project as > well; at least according to Ninja.) > > --Ben > > -- > -- > tup-users mailing list > email: [email protected] > unsubscribe: [email protected] > options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "tup-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- tup-users mailing list email: [email protected] unsubscribe: [email protected] options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tup-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
