W dniu 2014-09-08 19:22, Chris Johnson pisze:
TUP looks great. I've a fairly large and ever growing project (500
source files, 150 directories) I need to frequently build.
But having to install FUSE is a major problem. On Mac OSX, it appears
to require a kernel extension. On FreeBSD, there are other problems.
It's a clever idea using a filesystem to intercept the compiler, but
ultimately, a complexity which makes Tup an unworkable solution for some
people.
Recentyl I was thinking whether it would be possible to make tup work on
Linux and other systems in the way it works on Windows - that is by
hooking all system calls that are used to access file (open, close,
read, write, ...). If such hooks are possible on other systems, then
this appears to be simpler and less problematic than FUSE... On Windows
it "just works" (apart from the lacking 64-bit support and no support
for variants).
It would be really nice to see tup popularity growing, as it really is a
great idea!
Regards,
FCh
--
--
tup-users mailing list
email: [email protected]
unsubscribe: [email protected]
options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tup-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
