On 09/25/2014 04:04 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Would you mind testing Ninja (with CMake, gn, gyp, or hand-written) as well? I'm curious (and it could give a good baseline for how fast the build could be) as to the difference.

Actually I guess we could determine the baseline with the new (and not exactly 100% bug-free (; - https://github.com/gittup/tup/issues/179 ) feature - tup generate. It generates shell script with all the commands that need to be executed. I guess no tool can be faster than that, rigth? There are however many problems with this feature right now, so there is no project that I could test it on - each one produces a different error...

Regards,
FCh

--
--
tup-users mailing list
email: [email protected]
unsubscribe: [email protected]
options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tup-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to