Fine by me :-))
/colin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 3:29 PM
Subject: Removing WM and FreeMarker support
> Hi,
>
> I've had a couple discussions with people on IRC (jon & dave) about
> removing WM and FreeMarker support and only supporting Velocity
> and JSP.
>
> I think this would help maintenance and we would still be supporting
> the two most widely used view mechanism in Turbine. We can than focus
> on the Velocity/JSP integration, and make these two view mechanisms
> work well.
>
> I tried at first to make a WM context adapter and ran into the problem
> of every last friggin' method in WM so that I couldn't override get/put
> in a WM context in order to make an adapter. Easy enough to fix, but
> than I said why bother. WM is so complicated internally compared to
> Velocity and they are so similar in syntax that I don't see much point
> in supporting them both. Is anyone using FreeMarker?
>
> I would like to call what is being worked on Turbine 3.0 and dump
> all view mechanisms except velocity and jsp.
> --
>
> jvz.
>
> Jason van Zyl
>
> http://tambora.zenplex.org
> http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
> http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
> http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
