On 7/12/01 9:44 AM, "Dave Bryson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 July 2001 08:29 am, you wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've had a couple discussions with people on IRC (jon & dave) about
>> removing WM and FreeMarker support and only supporting Velocity
>> and JSP.
>>
>> I think this would help maintenance and we would still be supporting
>> the two most widely used view mechanism in Turbine. We can than focus
>> on the Velocity/JSP integration, and make these two view mechanisms
>> work well.
>>
>> I tried at first to make a WM context adapter and ran into the problem
>> of every last friggin' method in WM so that I couldn't override get/put
>> in a WM context in order to make an adapter. Easy enough to fix, but
>> than I said why bother. WM is so complicated internally compared to
>> Velocity and they are so similar in syntax that I don't see much point
>> in supporting them both. Is anyone using FreeMarker?
>>
>> I would like to call what is being worked on Turbine 3.0 and dump
>> all view mechanisms except velocity and jsp.
>
> +1
>
> dave
Cool. I think that almost everyone will agree. I will remove the
code and update Gump later on tonight.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
