On 10/22/01 3:30 AM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 10/21/01 9:27 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> on 10/20/01 2:39 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> + * <li>A method for retrieving the values keyed by prefix-less keys >>>> + * when a key prefix is set.</li> >>>> + * >>>> + * <li>Missing key message format pulled from TR.props.</li> >>> >>> This is not correct HTML. >> >> What's not correct about it? > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xhtml1-20011004/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd > > <!ENTITY % lists "ul | ol | dl | menu | dir"> > > <!-- LIStyle is constrained to: "(%ULStyle;|%OLStyle;)" --> > > I believe that <li> needs to have ul or ol within it. > Don't you really need <li> in <ul> or <ol>? <ol> <li>Foo</li> <li>Bar</li> </ol> -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] System and Software Consulting You're going to end up getting pissed at your software anyway, so you might as well not pay for it. Try Open Source. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
