"Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 10/22/01 3:30 AM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> on 10/21/01 9:27 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>>> on 10/20/01 2:39 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> + * <li>A method for retrieving the values keyed by prefix-less keys >>>>> + * when a key prefix is set.</li> >>>>> + * >>>>> + * <li>Missing key message format pulled from TR.props.</li> >>>> >>>> This is not correct HTML. >>> >>> What's not correct about it? >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xhtml1-20011004/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd >> >> <!ENTITY % lists "ul | ol | dl | menu | dir"> >> >> <!-- LIStyle is constrained to: "(%ULStyle;|%OLStyle;)" --> >> >> I believe that <li> needs to have ul or ol within it. >> > > Don't you really need <li> in <ul> or <ol>? > > <ol> > <li>Foo</li> > <li>Bar</li> > </ol>
Correct, which is exactly as it is. There may have been some confusion in that there is a OL inside one of the LI elements of a surrounding UL. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
