On 11/19/01 11:33 AM, "Colin Chalmers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all, > > To all the developers (Jason/John) who helped me on IRC last friday a big > thanx and apologies if I caused any unnecessary noise. > > Today I started afresh with the most up-to-date JARS & started by building > Torque. > > I am now producing code based on *idmethod=native* and containing what > appears to be what we're looking for (I'm still testing). > > However I now getting an error whilst compiling my new OM tree and it's to > do with the Tablemap in Turbine 2.2b & Torque 1.0 (checked out source this > morning). The Mapbuilder class returns a Torque.TableMap whereas the > PeerClass expects a Turbine.Tablemap. I could solve this by giving the full > class name but are there any differences between the two? You'll have to wait a couple days for Turbine 2.2 to work with the decoupled Torque. It will basically involve not using the db service at all and using Torque directly. Sorry for the delay but there are some things in Torque to work out before an RC can be pushed out into the big wide world. > One other question, is the solution to the (Oracle DB) increment problem > solved specifically in the mapbuilders or are there things in the objects & > peers I should look out for? You should not need to even look at the generated code. If you choose idmethod="native" than Oracle sequences will be used. Are you having a problem because of the mixing of the decoupled Torque and Turbine 2.2? > /Colin > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
