On 11/19/01 2:59 PM, "Colin Chalmers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jason, > > Ahem, I hadn't quite updated all of the om tree template (imports) in my > present templates. (I've also noticed a few other wee bits & pieces that > I'll still have to merge with my templates but that can wait 'till > tomorrow.) > > Changed that and now the om tree is compiling :-)) I've asked a colleague > of mine to test the code (right James? He's on the list as well) to give me > feedback on the inserts etc. Thx for the tips!! > > I notice that for generating intake files I would need to start using the > fulcrum. Is that advisable right now? God how often do you get this question > :-) > Or is there some way to use it (Intake) without Fulcrum and with present > Torque/Turbine2.2 I've mentioned this before, but when Torque is release than I will go onto Fulcrum. Both Fulcrum and Torque will be directly usable from Turbine 2.x and 3.x. This is an attempt to try and stop maintaining both service trees and both torque trees. > /Colin > -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
