On Monday, January 21, 2002, at 02:14 PM, Gonzalo A. Diethelm wrote:
> * It would be very good if we could standardize on the names used for > different entities in the model: I have used User, Credentials > (password), Permissions, etc., others have used different terms. > Is there a standard we can follow? +1. I would vote for adopting JAAS's names even if we choose not to use JAAS. I don't think their names are especially clear, but there already exists lots of documentation explaining what the names mean. Consider it another form of reuse. > * It would be very good if Turbine's default implementation of the > security model did not require a DB; this way, we would be lowering > the requirements for new users to install Turbine. +0 > * I think it is necessary to port Turbine's current security > implementation, > along with a couple more implementations long overdue (LDAP!) to > this new security model. +1 -Eric -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
