Gonzalo A. Diethelm wrote: >>>* It would be very good if we could standardize on the names used for >>>different entities in the model: I have used User, Credentials >>>(password), Permissions, etc., others have used different terms. >>>Is there a standard we can follow? >>> >>Sounds good. >> > >Cool! Eric Dobbs suggested using JAAS terminology, which sounds ok. > >>We'll get a little more feedback on the list, then I would like >>to write up >>a little strategy and then it's all yours if you want it! Once we >>agree on a >>strategy if you and others want to implement it that would be >>great. Then I >>can move on to something else. >> > >Deal. >
I will also be more than willing to help on it. I am currently working on my custom database implementation that I can plug in and use as a test framework for the new security model. - Dan Diephouse -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
