On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 13:21, James Taylor wrote: > I think continuing the version numbers from the monolithic turbine is a > good idea, thus torque-2.2 and 3.0, fulcrum-2.2 and 3.0. Seems to have > the least potential for confusion.
So you want to call the decoupled versions 3.0, yes? > -- jt > > On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 13:13, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As things are now decoupled how do we want to version Torque and > > Fulcrum. There are some version numbers on their currently but I think > > it's been fairly arbitrary. > > > > Should Torque and Fulcrum actually be 2.2 or 3.0 or something different > > all together. I would like to tag all the repositories with what we > > decide before releasing the 2.2 beta 1. > > > > -- > > jvz. > > > > Jason van Zyl > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > http://tambora.zenplex.org > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
