On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 14:41, Daniel Rall wrote:
> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > As things are now decoupled how do we want to version Torque and
> > Fulcrum. There are some version numbers on their currently but I think
> > it's been fairly arbitrary.
> >
> > Should Torque and Fulcrum actually be 2.2 or 3.0 or something different
> > all together. I would like to tag all the repositories with what we
> > decide before releasing the 2.2 beta 1.
> 
> The decoupled components should be versioned separately from Turbine
> itself.  I would like to start the versioning for the decoupled
> components at 3.0, as that's approximately where they were broken out
> from Turbine proper.

All right. 3.0 it is. Probably the best place to start, I'm not
particularly fussy I would just like to prevent confusion so the 3.0
route is probably the best.

 
> - Dan
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- 
jvz.

Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://tambora.zenplex.org


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to