John,
I increased the size of the VM to 256MB, but I am still running into the
same issue.. the memory footprint of the JVM is not increasing beyond 70MB..
and I am still running into the same kind of issues..
Does it have problems with just the Extended objects or does it not
generate some of the Base classes too?. If I can assume that it generates
the Base classes correctly, then I can easily write scripts for generating
the Extended Base and peer objects as a work around.
I dont find any Base classes of size 0.. Is there any thing in the log
file that I have that might interest you?.
Thanks much -Subhash.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John McNally" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Turbine Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: Empty Extension Objects
subhash wrote:
>
> John,
> Thanks for the response.
>
> Can you suggest any work arounds for this problem?. Is memory
footprint
> on the box of any use?.
>
> Should I try increasing the heap size of the VM when it startup?.
increasing the amount of memory available should help.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
