Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Not unrealistic. I've basically been working on Maven and Turbine in
>tandem because I don't even want to attempt anything with Turbine until
>Maven is working. b5 is working now, I would like to move the
>descriptors forward because I always use Turbine as a guinea pig. I know
>that for most projects it's not a good idea to use CVS HEAD but again I
>would like to use Turbine as a test.
Please do not use Turbine-2 / Fulcrum / Torque as "guinea pigs". At
least not until there is no longer talk on the maven list about
"features gone from b5 that were present in b4" (war task comes to
mind). Or even better, let's get a maven release. (Scary thought).
There are people (e.g. me :-) ) actually working on the Fulcrum HEAD
branch and it is really annoying to come into the office in the
morning to find out that I have to upgrade three more tools just to
keep working where I left off in the evening.
I have a _completely_ revamped DB Security Service ready to go in. It
has > 1000 lines of documentation (!), allows free selection of peer,
OM and base classes, can make coffee and the world a cleaner, shinier
place. (Martin and Stephen Habermann already got a copy and I will
file a proposal later). I hate to rewrite it all three days because a
new version of maven comes out. :-(
People, please. Can we get some 1.0 releases? Like Geir does with
Velocity? There are actually release versions. :-) I'd love to see a
Maven 1.0. A Torque 3.0. A Fulcrum 3.0. Something without "-dev" or
"-snap" in the jar names.
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Geschaeftsfuehrer
INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Schwabachgrund 22 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
