Daniel Rall wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>Martin Poeschl wrote:
>>
>>>Pat Monardo wrote:
>>
>>...
>>
>>>>Issue 3. Service framework. So many changes? What will be left of
>>>>fulcrum if Turbine moves to Avalon service framework? I know stratum is
>>>>gone but does fulcrum disappear as well?
>>>>
>>>
>>>maybe someone working on the avalon stuff could answer this one ...
>>>fulcrum will not disappear .. fulcrum services will become avalon
>>>components
>>
>>Which I find really exciting! =:-)
>>
>>You have many services that we don't yet have, and IMHO we could make
>>a common repository for these Components...
>
>
> +1, a common repository would be useful. How about a
> jakarta-avalon-components module in SVN/CVS?
We already have excalibur for Components and Containers, Cornerstone for
Blocks...
But /personally/ (I repeat /personally/), I would really like to see a
common repository for Avalon Components, where other projects can put in
theirs...
Personally I'm +1, but you'll have to get support from others too I
guess... propose it, I'll back you, for what my word is worth.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
