On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 13:14, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > James Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 12:38, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > >> Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> >> You have many services that we don't yet have, and IMHO we could make > >> >> a common repository for these Components... > >> > >> >+1, a common repository would be useful. How about a > >> >jakarta-avalon-components module in SVN/CVS? > >> > >> Hm, > >> > >> while the idea is cool, I'd prefer to get the fulcrum stuff to > >> actually work with T2 and T3 and then migrate a stable code base. The > >> current fulcrum code base is "preliminary" at best... :-) > >> > >> Please allow us to make at least one Fulcrum release before migrating > >> to yet another platform... > > >I'm a little confused about the direction of fulcrum right now. My > > Just like all of us. :-)
The core of fulcrum should die. The service code moved to the commons, and avalon components made by building on the commons packages. > >understanding was that Turbine 2.2 is going to be released _without_ it > >(just decoupled torque, not other services), and we've been talking > >about Turbine 3 using Avalon for its component needs. > > Yes. Turbine 2.2 will be with coupled services in o.a.turbine.services. > It will work without Fulcrum. You can, however, use Fulcrum as a > component with the ComponentService ( :-) ) and then use the fulcrum > services with the T2 framework. > > T3 currently has no own services and uses Fulcrum. There is no T3 and > no Fulcrum release yet, so I'd like to see a Turbine 3 release and a > Fulcrum release to get a stable base for post-T3 development. I don't care about Fulcrum but there won't be a t3 release for a while or if people want to release what's there I will call what I'm working on t4. > ATM > there doesn't seem to be too much T3 development at all, because all > of the main developers went off to other projects. T3 needs the > pipeline polished and documented so more people start using it. I haven't gone anywhere. I'm working on Turbine full-time just not what's in the t3 repository as I still consider that a cleanup of the t2 code. Other than the pipeline there isn't that much difference. It works fine but I personally still think it's not very good. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
