Scott Eade wrote: >>From: Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>I am now proceeding with the following steps: >>1. Organizing for an apache.org domain to point to the werken.com Scarab >>instance. >>2. Updating the project.xml files for the above projects to point to the >>werken.com Scarab instance (depending on how difficult it becomes to >>establish the apache.org domain name it may be necessary to point these to >>the werken.com address as an interim step). >>3. Organizing for bugzilla to no longer accept turbine issues. >>4. If someone can provide me with the admin userid for the Scarab instance >>at issues.apache.org/scarab I will flag the unused modules over there as >>deleted. > > > I published this list of steps over on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > received a response from Pier Fumagalli that indicated that if we want it we > can get the necessary karma to maintain the Scarab instance at > issues.apache.org/scarab (this is actually the nagoya box). > > I think we would all prefer to have only a single scarab install, but which > one will it be and which project will suffer. Here is the choice: > > Either: > 1: Stick to the migration plan outlined above and try and convince the OJB > guys to join the other turbine projects over at scarab.werken.com.
-0 > Or > 2: Update the issues.apache.org/scarab instance and migrate the torque > issues over from werken.com. +1 we should use nagoya if possible ... martin > > While opinions from everyone are most welcome, I think this decision really > lies in the hands of Stephen Haberman and John McNally - the people that > volunteered to maintain the scarab install. I'll just sit on my hands until > I hear from these two. > > Cheers, > > Scott -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
