I now have access to nagoya and will attempt to upgrade the instance this weekend. More details will follow. Please continue using werken for torque and if there is a pressing need, to add new projects there, until further notice.
john mcnally On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 08:15, Stephen Haberman wrote: > > Bob and I have a managed host at rackspace and I think that's a much > > better option. John McNally has root access as do Bob McWhirter and > > myself. I think we're far better off doing it on the rackspace box. > > Ah, okay, that makes sense. > > Everyone save you, John, and Bob was out of the loop on the nagoya > problems and hence didn't know the reasoning behind the move to werken. > > Now that we've been clued in about the move and the approval of other > Apache management of werken instead of it just being some rogue box, I > think most of us will abandon the 'werken is okay but nagoya is > preferred' mindset. > > Thanks for the info plus the use of the werken box. > > > Scott, you said you were going to look into DNS entries for werken? > Besides scarab.apache.org, I think werken.apache.org would be good as > then the box could potentially used for other, miscellaneous things and > be easily associated with apache. > > (Just my na�ve opinion; if there are better/other suggestions, that's > fine) > > Thanks, > Stephen > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
