> I don't know about having one version right now... Since I use Scarab at > work, that is running under version 3.0. And since Scarab seems pretty full > fledged ;-), I would say that if it is good enough for Scarab, then it is > good enough for me.
I'd thought the same thing for awhile. And I do think it's great that Turbine was a sort of poster child that some of the Turbine developers work on to showcase the technology and keep development active and what not. But just because Scarab uses T3 doesn't mean T3 is a good code base (not that it's bad, but in comparison to Summit) and should be released. I'd venture to say that Scarab could/should be easily ported to Summit, assuming Summit becomes T3/T4, as Turbine is just a framework that sits above the actions/templates and handles hooking them together (Fulcrum aside). As long as Summit does things the same way, albeit much cleaner internally, and Plexus can handle Fulcrum services with little modification, I see little reason for not moving to the new Summit code base and letting T3 stay at alpha. - Stephen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
