Martin, Sounds simple enough.
What should be done with enhancements, should it be done in Turbine or Fulcrum, both? And is there anything that should be taken into account to ensure we move closer to Avalon? I also think you mentioned a preference for releasing more often, what would be the time frame for 2.3? 3 months? /c ----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Poeschl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Turbine Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 3:21 PM Subject: [vote] plans for turbine 2.3 > i posted my plans for the next version of turbine some weeks ago .. now > it's voting time ;-) > > o remove all deprecated stuff (+ code cleanup) > incl. the freemarker and webmacro support (nobody is using it and the current versions are not > supported) > > o switch to commons-logging > > > +2 > > martin > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
