On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > > >... > >> Working with CVS _requires_ some attention. Unfortunately this is not > >> BitKeeper where we can undo large changes easily. :'-( > > >Eventually the ASF will run Subversion <http://subversion.tigris.org/>, > >which is even better than BitKeeper given its very solid open source > > Nah. Won't. start. SCM. debate. =:-) > > The "very solid open source" really made me smile.
I'm glad to have brightened your day. > I remember the comments of Al Viro (which I do trust about code taste) on > LKLM about Subversion. (Google for +"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" +subversion) > or look at http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0210.0/2508.html Interesting how a completely unsupported post from two and a half months ago by some random kernel hacker skews your view, Henning. Have you ever looked at the Subversion source code? Have you even used Subversion? IMHO, the code base is excellent, especially for a project only two years old. > Ah well. CVS it is. :-) As soon as Subversion hits 1.0, the Infrastructure team will install it on ASF servers and we will begin to transition over to it. Initial preparations have already begun. - Dan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
