> -----Original Message----- > From: Gonzalo Diethelm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 7:17 AM > To: Turbine Developers List > Subject: RE: Turbine, Fulcrum, and Avalon > > > > On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 16:20, Quinton McCombs wrote: > > > I would like to propose that we drop stop using the > stratum lifecyle > > > interfaces altogether in favor of Avalon's interfaces. > > +1 (although I think I'm still a committer, I consider my vote > to be non-binding, since it's been REALLY long since I have > contributed anything to Turbine). > > >From what little I understand about all the issues here, I > would try to go with Fortress as a single, unified container > for Turbine; initially, I would keep the static accessors as > a facade, for compatibility reasons, but I think those should > eventually be deprecated. >
+1 I say deprecate them as soon as we have a DOCUMENTED method of accessing the components without going through the services layer. > Regards, > > > -- > Gonzalo A. Diethelm > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:turbine-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
