> -----Original Message----- > From: Rodrigo Reyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:19 AM > To: Turbine Developers List > Subject: Re: Freemarker support > > > Hi all > I've been reading the current posts about Freemaker and I > think it is > time to share my point of view. > I believe Turbine should be "tool-agnostic". What do I > mean? Turbine > should (and I think, it does most of the time) provide a > framework which > should be able to work with whichever tool I decide to use. > An example for > this: OR mapping tools. I know most people around Turbine like Torque. > Still, I don't. I may change my opinion later, but so far, I > prefer other > tools like Hibernator. So I think Turbine should provide a trully > "tool-agnostic" framework where I could use Hibernator > without any strings > attached to Torque.
That is understood and there has been a lot of work on decoupling Torque from Turbine. I've tried Hibernate with Turbine and it works fine. However, There are a few things that could be done to make it easier. Eric Pugh has been working on a HibernateService and that will make it easier. Probably the strongest dependence on Torque is on the security service. -- Humberto --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
