"Eric Pugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Hi guys..
>In the tradition of the Eclipse project and it's many many milestones, I
>wanted to see about publishing a 2.4 Milestone 1 tomorrow. Basically, there
>are various projects that are using various flavors of Turbine 2.4.
+1 Release early, release often is a good thing. As we do just a
milestone release, please remember to do a CVS tag so we can reproduce
the code that you have built the milestone from.
If you send me the jars, I can sign them with the turbine release key
and put them onto the apache download servers.
>Antelope, any META Turbine 2.4 flavor, and my personal copy of Scarab all
>come to mind.
I want to make a "META_1_2" tag this weekend and put the plugin onto
ibiblio. It is about time IMHO.
Scott, as you seem to be the lone Torque guy currently: Any objections
for calling a vote to release torque-3.1.1? I finally want to get an
"official" version of the Torque plugin out.
I feel that it is time to do some maintenance releases of the various
Turbine branches for quite some time. However, I want to sort out the
commons-logging issue for the 2.3 branch before rolling a release. And
I would really like to have torque-3.1.1 (not 3.2-dev or HEAD!) in a
2.3 relase.
>It would be nice for people to have a version called turbine-2.4-m1.jar that
>would be an explicit line in the sand in terms of features. It would
>include the pipeline, PipelineData, and everything else we have done in 2.4.
+1
>It won't include any changes/resolution to updating the Avalon container
>used in Turbine. It also won't include any of the new Fulcrum equivalents
>to Turbine services that haven't already been integrated.
We should also do a fulcrum milestone. I wouldn't want to see SNAPSHOT
references in the META flavor files.
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
"Fighting for one's political stand is an honorable action, but re-
fusing to acknowledge that there might be weaknesses in one's
position - in order to identify them so that they can be remedied -
is a large enough problem with the Open Source movement that it
deserves to be on this list of the top five problems."
-- Michelle Levesque, "Fundamental Issues with
Open Source Software Development"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
