> -----Original Message----- > From: Henning P. Schmiedehausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 17 October 2004 22:10 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Crypto Impl > > Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >Isn't it a bit 'heavy' to include the JavaMail system, just for Base64 > >encodings? > > >I suggest that org.apache.commons.codec.binary.Base64 is used instead > from > >jakarta-commons. > > Niclas, > > unlike other projects that may or may not be a part of the ASF, the > Turbine project cares about backward compatibility and our users.
Wow - nice and friendly! > If > you would have looked at our code for just a second, you would have > noticed, that there is a profound reason for using > javax.mail.internet.MimeUtility. Hint: The class is called > "OldJavaCrypt". > > >I suspect that there are other javamail deps for the same/similar reason. > > You are clueless and have no idea. You never ever looked at the code > you are talking about. You are just walking around spreading FUD. > Either look at the code and educate yourself before you speak up or go > away. Why are you exposing implementations? I though the api was there to isolate clients from changes. Steve. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
