Scott Eade wrote:
* Decide on a VP and fill in the blank on the proposal. I will gladly
support anyone else that nominates themselves for this role, but will
nominate myself in the absence of any other offers.
I think that you would be the right person for the PMC chair, as Henning
already suggested and I will be happy to support you (and learn!).
* Reading the Velocity TLP mail archive there was discussion concerning:
-- Dormancy. This was dismissed fairly quickly, but similar arguments
could be applied to Turbine. At the end of the day we have a bunch of
committers (including members) that are interested in seeing patches
applied and continued incremental progress on Turbine and it's related
Fulcrum components.
I guess this would be a good time to clean up a bit in the heap of
Fulcrum components (the good into the pot, the bad into the crop). That
would make things easier to maintain.
-- Future plans. While we do occasionally discuss this, we should take
advantage of the Wiki to document this a little better. Again, the
reality is that with limited time available we are progressing only
slowly towards our next Turbine release. I do not however feel that
this is a problem - progress is being made and fixes are being
backported to the 2.3 branch as necessary.
I'd suggest to do a 2.3.x release in the near^H^H^H^Hnot to far future
to make some of the changes publicly available.
Bye, Thomas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
