on 4/17/02 2:37 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jon/everyone else, > > I've been putting off making a patch to the build process that makes the > dist include LICENSE*, e.g. LICENSE.turbine, LICENSE.httpclient etc. Is > this a convention in use for your projects. It should be 'LICENSE.turbine.txt', 'LICENSE.httpclient.txt'. Also, future ASF licenses (2.0) will be a general license which does not need to be modified across projects. > Most projects I'm on have a LICENSE file, no txt extension. And I think that is wrong. It is also against the proposed jakarta specifications... http://jakarta.apache.org/site/dirlayout.html -jon -- Nixon: "At least with liquor, I don't lose motivation."
