Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/04/2002 07:49:36 AM:
> on 4/17/02 2:37 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > jon/everyone else, > > > > I've been putting off making a patch to the build process that makes the > > dist include LICENSE*, e.g. LICENSE.turbine, LICENSE.httpclient etc. Is > > this a convention in use for your projects. > > It should be 'LICENSE.turbine.txt', 'LICENSE.httpclient.txt'. Also, future > ASF licenses (2.0) will be a general license which does not need to be > modified across projects. Even better. > > Most projects I'm on have a LICENSE file, no txt extension. > > And I think that is wrong. It is also against the proposed jakarta > specifications... > > http://jakarta.apache.org/site/dirlayout.html Works for me. I'm happy for Maven to follow the guidelines, and for the projects I work with to be changed to meet them. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Work: http://www.multitask.com.au Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers
