Cool. Thanks for the opinions. Believe it or not, this sort of discussion
will definitely sway me. I can see your point wrt commons and Ant. The
difference for us is that we don't just download ant (at the moment),
whereas the dependencies we do.

I doubt anyone would want a maven release to wait on releasing other
projects.

A vote anyone?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Work:      http://www.multitask.com.au
Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers


                                                                                       
                               
                    "Peter Lynch"                                                      
                               
                    <peterlynch@minds       To:     "Turbine Maven Developers List"    
                               
                    pring.com>               <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>    
                               
                                            cc:                                        
                               
                    05/27/02 01:08 PM       Subject:     Re: Will Maven's final 
release be Ant 1.4.1 compatible?      
                    Please respond to                                                  
                               
                    "Turbine Maven                                                     
                               
                    Developers List"                                                   
                               
                                                                                       
                               
                                                                                       
                               





----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Turbine Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 4:35 AM
Subject: Re: Will Maven's final release be Ant 1.4.1 compatible?


>
> I'm happy to support Ant 1.5 when it's released. That's not far away, but


To be clear, it would be OK with me if Maven's official release does not
support
< Ant 1.5 for all plugins.

> most builds these days are done with 1.4.1, and we need to support the
most
> common build environment.
>

Respectfully disagree. I hear talk about supporting only released code but
don't
buy it. Maven is still in Beta. Maven has dependencies on commons-lang 0.1,
comons-io 0.1, commons-util 0.1, and dvsl 0.43. Will people that use Maven
in
Beta come to terms with that?

Having as a dependency a stable Ant 1.5 Beta is not different than the
above
dependencies to me while Maven is in Beta. Besides, Ant 1.5 features that
are
needed in Maven may begin to clutter Maven's source eventually.

Then again, does Maven wait until all the above have official releases
before
it's own 1.0 release? That may not be realistic either. Interesting. I
guess
we'll see.


> Which issues, other than javadoc do we have with jdk 1.4? I'm running it
at
> the moment, and that's my only hassle.
>
> Re: the J2EE Plug-in/Ant 1.5 dependencies, I 'fixed' those on the
weekend,
> let me know if it's broken.
>
> I'm happy that Ant 1.5 support will be pretty easily done, as my
experience
> with it is proving fairly seamless.

Proving good for me too.

-Peter

<snip>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>






--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to