Looked at the mail archives.. See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=102278913119635&w=2 for my motivation. It switched someone from -1 to +0 :) Maybe you missed it ;) I think adding a new target is overkill and you suggested that that target should skip tests (according to the archives). I just want tests all the time, but don't want it stopping my complete build, when I don't want to. Betwixt was failing tests, and that version was used in Maven, and the website just not got updated, that said it failed the tests (as a simple example). Isn't that the feedback we want or is it the way to go to "misinform" people that actually everything was ok, while it was not ? (ps Don't know if the website gets updated by someone at all, so leaving that in the middle.)
Mvgr, Martin On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 02:12, James Taylor wrote: > On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 18:33, Martin van den Bemt wrote: > > > I redid the patch that handles an invalid pomversion better (catches the > > numberformatexception thrown and shows a "nice" message saying what was > > wrong). > > Excellent. > > > Also the patch which allows to no fail on the testscases, but just > > continue building the system. The -1 that was there, was changed to -0. > > Actually, my -1 on this still stands. I believe Jeff agreed that it > would be better to have a separate target rather than a property to make > the behavior as explicit as possible. > > -- jt > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
