On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 23:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Cool. I remember that discussion now. > > So what is the issue with requiring Xerces 2.0 and above? We have it in > /turbine/jars, right? > > Or is it that we wanted to do it without requiring a specific parser, but > got a Xerces 2.0 validator working first...
Yup, I was just trying to get the validator going. It should be JAXP'd. > -- > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > Work: http://www.multitask.com.au > Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers > > > > > "Pete Kazmier" > > <pete@kazmier. To: Turbine Maven Developers List > > com> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > cc: > > 06/05/02 01:09 Subject: Re: [PATCH] resubmit of 2 >patches.. > PM > > Please respond > > to "Turbine > > Maven > > Developers > > List" > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:52:42AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Martin, rather than catch the number format exception here, how about > > we add the existing validate-pom target into the verify-project target > > called before anything gets run, > > We purposely did not add the validate pom target into a target that is > automatically run because the user is required to use Xerces-2.0 to get > the validation working. At the time, we decided we didn't want to > impose this requirement on the user. Instead, we opted to provide the > target, and state in the documentation that Xerces-2.0 is required to > use this target. > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: < > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: < > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
