I got a compliment on the ease of building betwixt using the generated
build.xml ;) fyi..

Mvgr,
Martin

On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 23:38, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 17:06, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
> > Ok, so the whole point of lib.repo is so that we don't have to have a
> > bazillion copies of the same .jar file on our hard disk. So, why is it that
> > when you do:
> > 
> > maven ant:generate-build
> > ant
> > 
> > It downloads files to project/lib?
> 
> Look at the message on the commons for the reason why I did it that way.
> 
> I don't like it either. But for the build to work out of the box with
> nothing having to be done by the user then that's the only way to do it.
> 
> If, in the commons, we agreed that maven.repo.local (was lib.repo) is a
> 'common' thing then the ant build can be generated accordingly. I didn't
> want to assume anything by the user due to the outbreak of whining on
> the commons list.
>  
> > -jon
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -- 
> jvz.
> 
> Jason van Zyl
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://tambora.zenplex.org
> 
> In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
> and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it.
>   
>   -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to