I will add it.. (if all agree that is..) I'll also check what's the matter with the unecessary downlaods..
Mvgr, Martin On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 01:07, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > on 7/11/02 2:38 PM, "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Look at the message on the commons for the reason why I did it that way. > > > > I don't like it either. But for the build to work out of the box with > > nothing having to be done by the user then that's the only way to do it. > > > > If, in the commons, we agreed that maven.repo.local (was lib.repo) is a > > 'common' thing then the ant build can be generated accordingly. I didn't > > want to assume anything by the user due to the outbreak of whining on > > the commons list. > > #1. Check to see if there is a maven.repo.local > #2. If true, then copy .jar file from maven.repo.local to project/lib > #3. If false, then copy .jar file from website to project/lib > > No need to waste bandwidth. > > Also, I have noticed that .jar files which have not changed get downloaded > multiple times. What is up with that? Is the date checking off? > > -jon > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
